On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 09/07/2011 04:33 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Thats correct:
rpm -qp --changelog http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5/cr/x86_64/RPMS/httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.centos... | head
If a CentOS package contains aggregated upstream sequentially provided corrections, I think it is desirable to have all of the related RHSA/RHBA/RHEA links mentioned in the body of the related CentOS announce mail message. Just my opinion to provide better service.
A CentOS rpm only contains exactly what was in the corresponding srpm released upstream. The only changes are to branding.
Ok, so let us see if I have now understood:
1) RH EL 5.7 official has httpd 2.2.3-53.el5.ia64.rpm at 21/07 and link to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1067.html in announcement
2) CentOS 5.7 iso not released yet, but when released it will contain the same rpm (apart from branding things) as upstream and an e-mail announcement in centos-announce will contain same link as 1) so package name will be probably httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
3) upstream releases a further update to the package 2.2.3-53.el5_7.1.ia64.rpm at 31/08 and link to http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html
4) CentOS 5.6 CR has been released at 15/08 and at 01/09 releases a package named httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm with the same link as 1) for RHBA because has been build from upstream 5.7 release and this will probably be the rpm presnet inside iso image BTW: the link Leon provided in his e-mail was to a next released CentOS httpd (notice the .1 in its name.. this was misleading for me... ;-)
5) On mirror under CR folder there are now (07/09): httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm (dated 01/09??) httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm (dated 05/09...)
[gcecchi@tekkaman ~]$ rpm -qp --changelog http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.6/cr/x86_64/RPMS/httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.cent... | head warning: http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.6/cr/x86_64/RPMS/httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.cent...: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID e8562897: NOKEY * Sat Aug 20 2011 Karanbir Singh kbsingh@centos.org - 2.2.3-53.el5.centos - Roll in CentOS Branding
* Fri Jun 17 2011 Joe Orton jorton@redhat.com - 2.2.3-53 - mod_cache: add "hard" argument to CacheMaxExpire (#379811)
* Thu May 12 2011 Joe Orton jorton@redhat.com - 2.2.3-52 - mod_include: fix parsing across bucket boundaries (#698402)
* Fri Apr 15 2011 Joe Orton jorton@redhat.com - 2.2.3-50
(build date is "Build Date: Fri 19 Aug 2011 05:22:46 PM CEST")
[gcecchi@tekkaman ~]$ rpm -qp --changelog http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.6/cr/x86_64/RPMS/httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.cent... |head warning: http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.6/cr/x86_64/RPMS/httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.cent...: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID e8562897: NOKEY * Thu Sep 01 2011 Karanbir Singh kbsingh@centos.org - 2.2.3-53.el5.centos.1 - Roll in CentOS Branding
* Wed Aug 31 2011 Joe Orton jorton@redhat.com - 2.2.3-53.1 - add security fix for CVE-2011-3192 (#733059)
(build date is "Build Date: Thu 01 Sep 2011 02:23:54 AM CEST")
SO I think that the CR announce at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2011-September/000293.h... contains only 5.7 rpm version, and correctly only the link to https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1067.html
while the CR announce for httpd-2.2.3-53.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm has to be sent yet (at least to the archives of centos-cr-announce) and will contain the link http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html
and so it will be for a further announcement in official centos-announce mailing list when 5.7 and its official updates will be released. HIH clarification for other guys too...