On 8 June 2014 17:37, Bryson Lee Bryson.Lee@sslmda.com wrote:
From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ned Slider Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 5:41 AM
Yet another +1
If a change is REQUIRED, that change should happen upstream in RHEL and then filter down to CentOS - i.e, if RHEL-7.1406 were to be released then a change to CentOS-7.1406 would make sense.
+1 for staying aligned with upstream. "CentOS X.Y == RHEL X.Y" is easy to explain to management and corporate IT organizations that are hostile / risk-averse to open-source. Anything that requires more words / though and you're on the defensive and have lost the battle.
+1 from me. Bryson's comment, above, is very pertinent.
Show me that the current system is broken and I will agree to fixing it. "Fiddling" for the sake of "fiddling" is not required; after all RHEL (and thus CentOS) is *not* Fedora.
Alan.