Matt Rose wrote:
I also have a wad of rubygems which are packaged and should be published somewhere (like a complete rails 2.1 environment, mod_passenger and other stuff).
a Ruby SIG would be good to get going, we ( ralph and I ) spoke about this a while back. I have about 4 dozen rpms that could also go into this.
we could put them up on github or I could host a publically available subver repo for ruby gem rpms, or something. It would be nice to have a central repo for exactly this kind of stuff. I wonder how hard it would be to do a gem2rpm script, like perl has with cpan2rpm.
projects.centos.org solves this very problem :D
But we would need a standard for the specs to get adopted, and working with atleast the Fedora standards would be a good place to start.
So, is there interest in the ruby SIG ? and who wants to take ownership of spec sanity checking ?