26 Nov
2010
26 Nov
'10
6:32 p.m.
On 11/26/2010 05:54 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
+1 for an optional repository. I like the name :)
I am not sold on the idea of calling it 'optional' - as mentioned before, we dont really have a supported and optional model in CentOS. Does everyone really want to go with the 'optional' name ?
Besides that I am not a fan of different installation medias for workstation and server. One of the advantages of CentOS always was to allow installation of both with one media kit.
cool!
- KB