On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/26/2010 07:38 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Which basicly means the thread was fine, until you got fed up with where it was going. Not sure why me mentioning the mock builds triggered you.
I actually did, in fact I have read all the emails and usually refrain from replying when I have an opinion (given my past).
I suggest you read it again, because your 'which basicly means' is incorrect.
As you stated yourself, you are being pedantic. And I think you are deliberately making this thread more worse than it should be.
Or you should stop feeling so insecure and thinking everyone is out to get you. I've almost always made requests to maintain sanity, not only on this list but plenty of other places as well.
I guess that's matter of opinion. The availability of recent mock packages for CentOS fits the centos-devel bill, just as the availability of kmod-packages for CentOS belongs on the general centos mailinglist.
Thats just bollocks. If every project was to announce every package in the main list, were looking at thousands of announcements there. You were repremanded after repeated spamming, not when you announced the efforts. And I am confident that we have been consistent with that policy over the years. Quite a few people have announced efforts and points of interest, its only when they digress into spamming have people objected.
Explain to me how sending two mails to find users to test, is "repeated spamming" ? And while you know better, you can't resist the urge to disinform.
I do think the problem is the content, as much as you don't like me mentioning we have alternative kmod-drbd packages (that actualy get updated frequently), you don't like others to discuss transparancy wrt. the build process or alternatives.
Well, this is the Internet, get used to it.