21 Jun
2014
21 Jun
'14
10 a.m.
Johnny Hughes wrote:
What better way to communicate that they are not standalone but are all only part of the MAJOR release and a POINT IN TIME part of that major release than to name them "<MAJOR RELEASE>.<POINT IN TIME>" ?
The current scheme represents <POINT IN TIME> as an integer that starts from zero and increments with each minor release.
I remain unconvinced that a YYMM representation of <POINT IN TIME> is any better.
Ron