On 05/24/2016 02:20 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
On 23/05/16 20:28, James Hogarth wrote:
On 23 May 2016 17:13, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny@centos.org mailto:johnny@centos.org> wrote:
I take that back .. the file will go away when we move to 6.8 ..
Good to know, but I still think it is worthwhile adding the obsoletes so that SCL users who may not realise the repo changed get transparently migrated to the supported solution.
I agree that this would be a good idea, and probably the original intention.
If it's OK with the CentOS developers to obsolete their package then you can send a PR to https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/centos-release-sclo/tree/el6 (the 'el6' branch) to add Obsoletes/Provides. The EVR of the package should already be higher in preparation.
Yes, obsoleting the package is fine. I am going to pull both that package and that original SCL directory/repo when we push the 6.8 tree in the next couple of days.
<snip>