Le 21/12/2020 à 21:27, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
Le 21/12/2020 à 18:31, Mike McGrath a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:13 AM John Crisp <jcrisp@safeandsoundit.co.uk mailto:jcrisp@safeandsoundit.co.uk> wrote:
That's the 'Extinguish' bit. Comes after 'Embrace' and 'Extend'.Uhhh, there is no Extinguish in Open Source. That's the entire point. We embraced, we extended. If others want to carry on the torch they are more than welcome to do so.
-Mike
Again, a fair way of doing things would have been, Hey guys since we Red Hat have bought CentOS, making a downstream release of RHEL is just a nonsense, It costs us time and money we can save. So let's reverse the process and make RHEL a downstream of CentOS, it will now be Fedora ELN - > CentOS Stream - > CentOS Linux - > RHEL.
There would have been no downstream build sponsored by Red Hat, CentOS Linux would have kill other clones this way, as it already did for Scientific Linux 8, the CentOS Community would have been happy to help to get a better RHEL in the Stream process, and Red Hat folks could have put all the value of their brand and specificities in their final products, backed with a strong ecosystem they could have controlled.
I eared you no answer about this proposal, could you tell me why if it's not all about grabbing more money from the CentOS Community ?
-Jean-Marc
I ask for a fourth time this proposal which still remains unanswered, but as we say in French, "who doesn't say word consents",therefore it is obviously a question of recovering money from the CentOS community with the subscriptionsRed Hat coming soon.
Jean-Marc