On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 06/17/2014 06:33 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
So, we can assume adding the proposed patches should be transparent to the plus kernel users, I suppose. Is this the case?
KB? To go ahead with this or not? A separate specific kernel?
either way you decide, i can help facilitate it either way
With my initial concern gone, I now have more practical question.
The modifications are quite extensive as noted in the beginning. I count 15 patches in include/ and 29 in /net . For each kernel update, the patch set must be updated/tested. Also there may be updates to the patches themselves within a given kernel release. How can this be best handled? Could dealing with the patches cause a delay in the cplus kernel release?
Having a separate kernel addressing the mptcp stuff might work around that potential issue.
Akemi