Re: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future

On 01/16/2014 02:31 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 06:45 -0600, Jim Perrin wrote:

...

We cannot dictate what 3rd parties do, and we'll very likely have to go through a period of proving to them that becoming a SIG and/or working together is a good idea. There's quite a bit of tension about this from many past experiences.

Working together is a *great* idea, but specifically in the context of third-party repositories, I'd personally see it more as a manpower issue (and mostly on their/our side).

Regarding the past tensions, I'm really hopeful that in view of the recent exciting news, the most prominent sources thereof will become something of the past.

Yury, you speak as a maintainer still involved with RepoForge/RPMForge, right?