Le 05/05/11 13:22, Karanbir Singh a écrit :
On 05/05/2011 12:17 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
The most important thing is RHEL5_X now sligthly differs with RHEL5_Y, and this may affect compatibility, like with the last mod_nss release. So I have an interest to immediatly visualise that my foo package, modified by CentOS, was rebuilt on el5_X rather than el5_Y.
Karanbir,
Let's have a little clarification. I wrote the above paragraph and I assume it. Dag wrote the (indigo) sentences below and I got them out of my post because I don't agree. I'm not with or against someone. I just want to discuss on a devel list, not to troll or give any food to some flam war.
I know, the CentOS developers are simply ignoring the relevance of this.
by assuming that the _x and _y imply that the code is built on, you already dont know what you are talking about
Ok, I assume that say that _x and _y having been built on different instances would have been a more correct assertion, but after saying that, doesn't the difference between these two instances still remains.
JML
It seems to be their new credo.
troll
- KB
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel