-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2014 07:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:14:27PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
I am hoping we can find a way to communicate this and sync with the epel folks in a manner that it does not cause too much issues. priorities will help i guess, but it will cause issues when people want to consume one and not the other ( either way ), specially when its down to libs
It's getting a bit late, but there is a session on the future of EPEL at Flock in Prague next month: http://sched.co/SbXE17 -- it'd be great to have interested CentOS people there.
As it happens, we've got a bunch of the core team planning to attend specifically to work on future-proofing discussions with Fedora.
Is anyone else planning on going?
- -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41