Dirk, havent you guys at RCM thought about that? Or was that just the naming schema for all the different versions of containers?
//G
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Mohammed Ahmed moahmed@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
We currently have openshift origin containers being delivered through the Container Pipeline.
However, with the release of openshift origin 1.3, we have to consider how we are going to deliver containers for v1.2.1 and v1.3.
Currently, the dockerfiles basically do a yum install origin[1] and other origin packages. This could possibly result in the latest origin rpms being used even in 1.2.1 containers. We need to consider how we are going to differentiate the versions.
Even if there aren't any updates to 1.2 containers on toe repos, its still possible the containers might get rebuilt from other triggers, such as base image rebuilds and so on.
KB, Troy Dawson, thoughts? Others are welcome to chime in as well.
[1] https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/release-
1.2/images/origin/Dockerfile.centos7#L13
*Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed* Associate Software Engineer, Redhat Developers Team (Devtools) http://mohammedzee1000.wordpress.com
RED HAT | DIFFERENT FOR THE SAKE OF BETTER TECHNOLOGY
Find out why every airline, telecom, commercial bank, healthcare, and financial data services company in the Fortune 500 relies on Red Hat.
Trusted | Red Hat https://www.redhat.com/en/about/trusted
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel