On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Sven Kieske s.kieske@mittwald.de wrote:
On 11/05/16 08:13, Julien Pivotto wrote:
We are open to cross sig collaboration. We still have to decide which Koji tags we will need for the ansible sig. Once that is done, we will work on github where any contribution will be welcome.
did the config management sig suddenly turn into an ansible only sig?
I don't think so.
looking at the suggested tags posted by Francois Cami:
As stated at the beginning of the thread, the Storage SIG needs Ansible. My proposal (which is identical to what is in the wiki) was therefore Ansible-centric.
Do you plan to release different tags for each config management tool?
See "koji tags": https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/ConfigManagementSIG
afaiu there should be one repository containing all cfgmgmt tools, or is this not possible due to different dependencies?
I don't think this is possible nor reasonable. We are aiming to ship multiple versions of some of these tools and having a single repository simply doesn't scale, but that's just my point of view.
Regards, François