Re: [CentOS-devel] how minimal is a minimal too minimal

On 03/19/2014 02:05 PM, Trevor Hemsley wrote:

On 19/03/14 16:57, Dan Porter wrote:

...

I like the name |server-minimal|, or even just |minimal| for the purpose of what the current version is.

Perhaps this super skinny version ought to be called.. |micro|?

If it's an image without yum then I'd suggest we call it 'broken' and be done with it!

There are quite enough people running systems without updates without encouraging them to do so.

T

+1

How would a 'micro' installation suggest installing software so that the image does something useful without yum?