On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 09:11 -0700, Kevan Benson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 08:49, you wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 07:25, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Kevan Benson wrote:
I'll admit, it does fit my above stated goal, but that's not the only reason I think it's worthwhile. Every other enterprise OS has their errata listed online. CentOS seems to be in the somewhat unique situation of having an upstream provider that has most the errata listed, so there's been less of a drive for this.
not sure I understand, http://lists.centos.org/ has a list you can get to via a webbrowser and even search around there for info if you like.
I think one of us is referring to apples, the other apple pie.
I'm not questioning the availability of the information, just it's presentation and accessibility.
So, should I take the silence on this topic as no, there isn't any desire for a web-based errata list beyond the searchable archives of the announce list, or just that everyone's too busy to comment?
FWIW: I do think it is useful. Lists are not very useful for asking things like "give me all vulnerabilities for package X from date A to date Z". Some more flexible database would be very useful.
-- Daniel