On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I would like to stay as close as possible to CentOS name, because it practically is CentOS, with third-party repositories enabled
You know, the CentOS project takes much care to avoid coming 'too close' to the trade marks of others ... It is just unfriendly not to respect that effort and history, and to consciously try to be 'as close as possible' to the mark of another
the proposed name form will cause brand confusion in the mind of un-careful readers who do not follow 'inside baseball' branding issues. It will result in 'load' coming to the CentOS support venues, rather than the place that shipped non-CentOS code. When the such confused souls do show up anyway in CentOS support venue, the load will fall on people other than your sub-project, Ljubomir. Is this just?
Please choose something else
my $0.02
-- Russ herrold