On 12/17/20 7:04 AM, Dan Seguin wrote:
Not really, no.
Read the rest: nobody (i.e. clients) can run anything developed on this platform without paying for the platform it was targeted for, correct?
I think you missed my point.
*From:* CentOS-devel centos-devel-bounces@centos.org on behalf of Sandro Bonazzola sbonazzo@redhat.com *Sent:* December 17, 2020 7:44 AM *To:* The CentOS developers mailing list. *Subject:* Re: [CentOS-devel] Before You Get Mad About The CentOS Stream Change, Think About…
Il giorno gio 17 dic 2020 alle ore 13:25 Dan Seguin <dan.seguin@cord3inc.com mailto:dan.seguin@cord3inc.com> ha scritto:
I see what you mean, and you saw what I meant. Will there be a "free" RHEL distro that people can develop on that won't need a paid license?Like https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/03/31/no-cost-rhel-developer-subscri... https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/03/31/no-cost-rhel-developer-subscription-now-available/ ?
All CentOS users who can not use stream (many will be able to, if they want .. some will not) should provide their use case to centos-questions@redhat.com
Red Hat is absolutely looking to provide more options for previous CentOS users.
There is also no reason 3rd party devel will not support Stream. It is absolutely in their best interest to do so.