Please do consider more discussions on issues such
as the yumconf
approach on this list.
yes, we know that we should have made a bit of noise about this yumconf issue before it went out into the wild. I think we've all learn't a lesson here.
I am gad you agree-accept that the core developers learn a lesson :-), I was a litle sad because I could not see any positive reaction to all our complains and ideas to get both side happy (just one srpm to give two packages)
I can understand also that you make such a public change just when another developer speak :-) maybe is an effect of "not everybody's words have the same weight". I personally agree with that way of thinking but I beleave if there was one thing that drive people from whitebox to centos at the begining was the strong decision control over the whitebox project that Jonh had and don't want to give away, Centos promise the opposite. It will be sad that that promise just demise over time (across consolidation of the project)
please, I know that my words are one of the less weighted :-) because I just use and make promotion of the CentOS project (not big deal) but maybe other peoples has the same impresion....
cu roger PD: please accept my appologies for my bag english :-)
__________________________________________ RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA )
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com