On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 12:39 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Phil Schaffner
...
I agree with you. This is a *bug* known to upstream. The CentOS bug report should not have been closed based on the fact building was successful by some people or under "certain" circumstances. But I am not the one who closed it ( have no such privilege anyway :-D ).
Yup - didn't intend to imply that you did. Hard to tell in a thread which comments are meant for the replied-to person and which are for general consumption (or in this case Karanbir consumption).
but closing it because upstream has closed it NEXTRELEASE does, so I guess it's a moot point for this particular case.
Yes, now it (closing the bug) is rationalized (after the fact). ;-P
We agree on that also! :-D
Cheers, Phil