Re: [CentOS-devel] handling ABRT

Karanbir Singh wrote:

On 11/26/2010 07:19 PM, David Hrbá?? wrote:

...

I'd stick with bugzilla instance.

• upstream provides updates for abrt<->bz integration
• it's working now, we need only bz instance

Well, a second reading on David's post leads me to the conclusion that he wanted to report to bugzilla, but not upstream :-)

...

• no need for someone to track upstream and implement changes downstream

Not entire sure if upstream would be happy to have that in, and once we release something - its quite hard to completely remove it from the wild.

I guess its a question we can ask

If we could only redirect to something like bugzilla.centos.org (for the abrt stuff) instead of upstream's bugzilla, that would be fine. There would still be a process of sorting real bugs from that bz instance and report them in mantis and/or upstream too :/