Hi,
That's exactly what I guessed that the issue was, because the RPMs seem to match (in terms of changelog at least)
Thanks Mohammed
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Trevor Hemsley trevor.hemsley@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 15/11/16 16:16, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 15.11.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org:
On 15/11/16 13:38, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.8.1.x86_64.rpm 23-Oct-2015 11:19 1.9M qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.7.1.x86_64.rpm 03-Feb-2016 16:51 2.1M qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1.x86_64.rpm 14-Apr-2016 12:16 2.1M qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1.x86_64.rpm 24-Aug-2016 13:40 2.1M
are this packages intentional (dist tag diff)?
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M
That looks to me like the
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M
was wrongly named and was then rereleased the following day with the correct one as
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M
Trevor _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel