Hi *,
I need help.
Can anyone confirm that this problem is reproducible? Or is this really a
unique condition with my local build environment?
I am willing to spend time to further investigate, but without any hint
what direction I should look this is becoming frustrating.
I cannot believe the local build target for the centos-stream9 kernel is
simply not supposed to work.
Beste Grüße
Sebastian Hetze
--
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat GmbH. Niederlassung Berlin
Leipziger Platz 16, 10117 Berlin
Mobil: +49 173 8914205
E-Mail: she@redhat.com
Registered seat: Werner von Siemens Ring 14, D-85630 Grasbrunn,
Germany Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen/Munich, HRB
153243,Managing Directors: Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael
O'Neill, Amy Ross
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 10:16 AM Sebastian Hetze
shetze@redhat.com wrote:
> I have tried -j4 and reduced the number of cores for the VM down to 4 and
> other than increasing the compile time I see no difference. The compile
> still fails with the rsync: Argument list too long error.
>
> Comparing the verbose output for successful and failing builds, I see
> warnings in the failing builds:
>
> Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h' differs
> from latest version at 'include/uapi/linux/bpf.h'
> Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h' differs
> from latest version at 'include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h'
> Warning: missing liburing support. Some tests will be skipped.
> Warning: you seem to have a broken 32-bit build
>
> I also see the use of clang in the failing builds, while the successful
> ones don't have it.
>
> Does this give any indication of what is going wrong?
>
> Beste Grüße
> Sebastian Hetze
> --
> Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat GmbH. Niederlassung Berlin
> Leipziger Platz 16, 10117 Berlin
> Mobil: +49 173 8914205
> E-Mail: she@redhat.com
>
> Registered seat: Werner von Siemens Ring 14, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Germany Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen/Munich, HRB 153243,Managing Directors: Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 5:54 PM Neal Gompa
ngompa13@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 9:53 AM Sebastian Hetze
shetze@redhat.com wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > To make things a bit more confusing: After quite some experimenting,
>> including completely new installations of the build host, I occasionally
>> get a successful build. But this appears to happen at random. Sequences of
>> "make dist-clean; make dist-all-rpms" sometimes succeed and sometimes fail.
>> There are no dmesg warnings or other indications of a problem with the
>> running VM.
>> >
>> > Is it possible, that the -j$(nproc) causes the problem? I do see "-j12
>> forced in submake: resetting jobserver mode." warnings from make.
>> >
>>
>> I personally use -j6 because anything higher is unpredictable on my
>> machine. But if that doesn't work, lowering to -j4 should be better.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.centos.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.centos.org
>>
>