mouss wrote:
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
Hi,
What do you think of customize CentOS web server errors ? See http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/WebServerErrors
Can't say I like "Object not found."
What's an object? my wife would wonder. She might understand Document, and she might understand Web Page and the like. Object is just too vague and has too many possible meanings, and which is correct depends enormously on context. OS/2 has objects, they're mostly persistent, and when I encountered them I had enormous difficulty understanding them even though I was already familiar with objects in Turbo Pascal.
the first thing I do when I setup a web server is disable any place that advertizes what OS and what version it is running. call it security by obscurity if you like, but I see no reason to provide information that is not necessary to run the service.
it is also a good practice to setup your own error pages, and make them more "useful": http://www.alistapart.com/articles/perfect404/
60-year-old Doris might not understand "404" but 60-year-old John most certainly does, and if Doris needs to ask him, she needs the technical stuff.
I generally agree with that document, but I think some of the language could be improved.
For example, change but only after he or she has fixed this problem to but only after fixing this problem.
I find many attempts at "non-sexist" language cumbersome or different enough to impede reading and understanding.
If there be people who truly find "only after he has fixed the problem" offensive, then surely my form is inoffensive to them, and it's usually easy enough to find to be not worth the debate. And it's often shorter too.
Also, be wary of use of humour; I once found a very long and humerous 404 explanation from a BSD site, along the lines of "I'm only a computer and I can't be expected to know everything and besides...," and it was rolled out at typing speeds so the tale also had good tension. It might not have seemed so funny on the thirtieth reading though.