Thanks for your work on this Karanbir and team. ;)
----- "Karanbir Singh" mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
| Hi, | | Ok, so the IA64 build is actually quite straight forward but needs a | large disk. We just need to start the builders and make sure it can | churn through all packages done since 5.0 - if all is well, then | things | *should* just build, since they did so upstream! and the i386/x86_64 | packages for CentOS built out of the same code base. Once we can get | to | the stage that 5.5 is at now, we can look at doing an iso set and | build | tree. | | No idea how long this is going to take. I am presently moving the 5.0 | + | updates tree's into place ( the src.rpms ), once that is done we can | see | what sort of a buildrate we get per day and do some numbers from there | on. | | I don't want to overload dev.c.o with the output, so let me have a | chat | with Ralph and Tru and we can workout what is a good place to post | this | content. | | Ideally, it would be good to have a Failed: report that lists the | issues | encountered during the build be posted online right away. So people | can | look at it and see if anything specific needs doing. For things that | do | build, we can setup a six hourly 'sweep' that moves packages into | place. | | More details in a day or so. | | - KB | _______________________________________________ | CentOS-devel mailing list | CentOS-devel@centos.org | http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel