-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/06/2015 07:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 03/05/2015 09:26 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
I'll give a +0 explained this way:
There is a risk with using GitHub's services under a few conditions:
- We get reliant on the proprietary workflow software. * We allow
it to become a canonical source. * Our use of the service is seen as tacit or explicit support of their company or model of working with open source software.
as we move from gitorious.org, so we can move from github should there be a need.
Thanks, yes, that's the gist of it.
I appreciate greatly that everyone here understands the value of open source and avoiding lock-in and such. I'll often make a point about such things just to "wave the flag" so to speak -- make a clear point in the public record about our stance on freedom, etc. So if people say, in this example, "Look, CentOS Project is embracing GitHub," we have a discussion thread to point to.
Regards,
- - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41