14 Jan
2011
14 Jan
'11
6:29 a.m.
On 1/13/11, Hubert Bahr hab@hbahr.org wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:59:10PM -0600, Hubert Bahr wrote:
A different perspective. RHEL-5, CentOS-5 no matter what point change is essentially obsolete. Thus the need for RHEL-6, CentOS-6 which are
Except for the whole "supported until 2014" thing
actually a couple of years late. How much has changed form 5.5 + updates to 5.6. How many existing systems will use the iso's instead of
Many will for new installs / rollouts where network installs,
Point made new installs/rollouts
Non-sequitur, your facts are uncoordinated. Check back again when you think about more than one use case.
jerry