Hi James,
That is great news!
What stands between the progress made so far, and the approval of the AltArch SIG? (If that's a rookie question answerable via FAQ page, please feel free to redirect me).
Thanks!
--Aaron
-----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of James O'Connor Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:50 PM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 ppc64le (power little endian) rpms, build logs, mock configs
Here are the first two rounds of CentOS 7 ppc64le rpms, build logs, and mock configs:
Round A: http://ppcbootstrap.lon1.centos.org/C7a/ppc64le/
* Built atop Fedora 21 ppc64le VMs * Built from http://vault.centos.org/7.1.1503/os/Source/SPackages/ and c7-ppc64le branch on git.centos.org * Source rpms were temporarily modified to remove circular dependencies during the bootstrap process
Round B: http://ppcbootstrap.lon1.centos.org/C7b/ppc64le/
* Built atop Centos 7 ppc64le VMs * Built from http://vault.centos.org/7.1.1503/os/Source/SPackages/ , http://vault.centos.org/7.1.1503/updates/Source/SPackages/ , and c7-ppc64le branch on git.centos.org * noarch rpms were skipped as those will be taken from c7-x86_64 * Only gcc.spec (%global build_ada 0), curl.spec (upstream testcase fix), ghostscript.spec (upstream segfault fix) and nss.spec (upstream fix for expired PayPal cert) were modified. I will provide further details on these alterations on the altarch ppc64le wiki page once that gets created.
Feedback is most welcome. You may find jpoc on the #centos-devel and #centos-ppc irc channels. Once the AltArch SIG is officially approved, we will share installable alpha/beta images and rpm repositories.
Thanks -James _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel