On 01/08/2015 02:07 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 8 January 2015 at 12:51, Johnny Hughes <johnny@centos.org mailto:johnny@centos.org> wrote:
eating that list of things missing right now, once I get it, I > will look at the build logs to see what we need to try to rebuild. Here is a list of Packages that have a .x86_64.rpm but will not have an i686.rpm If any of these are a show stopper for someone, we will need a way to make them build: http://fpaste.org/167305/ Hopefully we will have an installable test tree soon.Johnny, a bit confused.. this looks like a list of i686 packages
spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm supermin-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm supermin-helper-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm tboot-1.7.4-1.el7.i686.rpm virt-top-1.0.8-7.el7.i686.rpm xorg-x11-server-Xspice-0.1.1-9.el7.i686.rpm
Posted by hughesjr at 08 Jan 2015, 05:24:33 UTC
Right ... I took all the x86_64 rpms and I did a sed replace of x86_64 with i686 to generate a full list of i686 packages if everything built.
I then actually removed from the list everything we actually have that will build.
That leaves this list .. which is package names (including i686) that will not build in i686.
I just want people to see what is NOT going to be in there.