1 Mar
2021
1 Mar
'21
4:44 p.m.
On 3/1/21 9:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 01:18:46AM +0000, redbaronbrowser via CentOS-devel wrote:
CentOS now seems more receptive to greatly expanding the number of SIGs. Hopefully this will mean critical EPEL packages will migrate under CentOS. Once that has been done, it should be possible to get a more consistent CD/CI across both Stream and the Stream Extended packages inherented from EPEL.
Why duplicate? I'd rather see CentOS SIGs with interest in EPEL packages actually work in EPEL.
I would agree with this for items where you are trying to maintain the same versions. no ned to duplicate work.
If they need different versions for the SIG than are in EPEL .. maybe maintain those in the SIG.