23 Dec
2008
23 Dec
'08
12:09 a.m.
Ned Slider wrote:
I agree with Dag that solution providers shouldn't be able to sell it as CentOS if it clearly isn't because they've modified, disabled or removed key parts of the system.
ok, so lets be clear about one thing - no-one except CentOS.org can distribute anything called 'CentOS'. Everything else is just 'derived from, based on, using parts of, inspired from etc.
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #centos@irc.freenode.net