Hi John,
On 01/05/2011 11:40 AM, JohnS wrote:
Karanbir,
Can you look into closing out the bugs that can be closed etc?
Yes, I will try and get to that either today or early in the day tomorrow.
Can also [1,2] be looked into to confirm package depends on abrt / report (hidden gotchas). Look at the example spec file at the changes that are required and the level of them that the Application Backend will have to support. Is there someone that can take on the App Server end?
Also needed to know if you are symlinking from "redhat-release" to "centos-release" or not. That depends on how other packages need to be patched, ie "lsb_release".
I am keen on looking at using a centos-release with a link over from redhat-release, but lets consider / look at the implications and fallouts before deciding on something for sure. There should not be any reason to patch redhat-lsb; whatever we do should not, ideally, have any impact on code and expectations from other apps ( specially since there might be implications to third party apps that we cant / dont want to have a feedback loop into )
What do you see as needing patched into redhat_lsb, that would fallout from the to-symlink or not-to-symlink decision ?
[1] http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4648 [2] http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4647