Re: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future

On 02/05/2014 03:28 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:

On 02/05/2014 12:00 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

...

...

or we find a way to have repos contain content that overwrites others, and use namespace overload or something other mechanism to allow it at any tier.

Yum priority= fits so nicely here. Just saying.

no it does'nt. priority has the same problem, its static in layers.

btw, have you looked at 'cost' instead ? its a far more elegant and better implemented mechanism that covers most ( but maybe not all ) of the same problem domain as yum priorities.

No, no one mention it so far, but I will check it out as soon as I can.