Hi Vesak, KB, could we meet over bluejeans some time? I am confused with what we are trying to achieve and why.
Thanks Bamacharan
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 16/02/16 13:15, Bamacharan Kundu wrote:
Hi Vašek, Yes, I have created pipeline with a nodejs based application(https://github.com/bamachrn/cccp-demo-test) with openshift build system. Openshift template is taking the git repo URI as input, and building, testing within the containers. As a output this is pushing the ready to run containers to the registry.
Went through the atomic reactor for reading index.yaml and cccp.yaml written by rtnpro, kbsingh.
I am currently working to understand the openshift template and build config to automate the build on git push or scheduled time.
Today I am trying to trigger with Github webhook. This is not triggering the build due to my IP being in private network. also waiting for the ci.centos.org http://ci.centos.org access to use jenkins in build process.
Please suggest if there is another way to achieve this.
Looks like we need to setup a syncup point
Thanks Bamacharan
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Vaclav Pavlin <vpavlin@redhat.com mailto:vpavlin@redhat.com> wrote:
Hey, any progress here? Vašek On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Vaclav Pavlin <vpavlin@redhat.com <mailto:vpavlin@redhat.com>> wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Bamacharan Kundu <bamachrn@gmail.com <mailto:bamachrn@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Vaclav, On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Vaclav Pavlin <vpavlin@redhat.com <mailto:vpavlin@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi Bamacharan, I'd be careful with per commit builds in case of build from Dockerfile as it takes time and resources (presumably a lot of both) because we have to build in clean env and with --no-cache. Why don't we take a layered based aproach, we can take the base image from local system then build it, this will save lot of time? I saw multiple dockerfiles for build,test,delivery which are intern the same image only. To un-confuse people who didn't see our IRC convo - the Dockerfiles in cccp-demo-openshift repo represent containers which implement individual steps of the workflow - not the images/containers which are tested and delivered. To answer "Why don't we take a layered based aproach": We do, building from Dockerfile follows the layered approach. The problem I am trying to emphasize is that we need clean environment for every build, otherwise we could introduce inconsistency again..But I think this could be easily solved by using Atomic Reactor instead of my custom hacky script:-) Cheers, Vašek I am not sure what you mean by " built image would be deployed to openshift instance". I was saying about building the docker container images in openshift for the build, test, delivery environments. My idea would be to go with the yaml files I saw in cccp-index and rtnpro's example repo as an UI right now - keep the code as little as possible. Hook it up to my example with some scripting, setup OpenShift and registry and try to get whole workflow working. Yes, I was going through the same. I tried with building the example you have put. I am going through the cccp-index and yaml file to add with the example you have put. I as a developer want to add a yaml file to my repo and submit my repo url somewhere, so that it gets rebuilt, tested and pushed to a given registry regularly (like 4 times a day for start). I also want to be notified about new build and test results. Yes, this yaml will help to handle all the linking and container management stuff. Done:-) We can polish it later. Makes sense? Sure, going ahead with this. Regards Bamacharan On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Bamacharan Kundu <bamachrn@gmail.com <mailto:bamachrn@gmail.com>> wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@centos.org <mailto:kbsingh@centos.org>>wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/02/16 07:29, Bamacharan Kundu wrote: > Hi, > > Vaclav presented the build pipeline verynicely and this would
> take out lot of tension for building the code,checking the code
> standards and test cases from the developer. > > I would like to add few points on this. > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Vaclav Pavlin <vpavlin@redhat.com mailto:vpavlin@redhat.com
> <mailto:vpavlin@redhat.com <mailto:vpavlin@redhat.com>>>
wrote: > > > Hi all, > > As KB wrote, I brought up the idea of usingOpenShift as a glue
> (i.e. workflow controller). The result can befound here:
> > https://github.com/vpavlin/cccp-demo-openshift > > TL;DR: > > The repository contains OpenShift Templatedefining the workflow -
> build,test, delivery and (very poorly)implements the steps through
> Docker images (i.e. Dockerfiles and runscripts).
> > The developer should do only git push to hisVCS and this should
> trigger the build process in the pipeline. in an onprem story that would map well, but note that were aiming to run a hosted service with a distinct UI ( even if the UI is no UI ) Yes, now I got it. I had a thought to minimize the number of Dockerfiles, so that the user does not get confused of. > > In this TDD process all the environments(including the build,
> test, delivery) would be created as acontainer and once the step
> is over it will destroy the environment. Asoutput this will
> generate a application runtime along with thesuccessfully built
> application code to registry. > > As you mentioned this would be tagged withtest along with jenkins
> build id, so that developer or QA can tracefor which commit this
> is built. > > Then for the next stages, successfully builtimage would be
> deployed to openshift instance to get throughthe test, delivery
> stages checking, along with the quality gates. > > all the stages should be linked to pipelineand should be easily
> re-producible so that any one can check orregenerate the issues
> instantly. add another dimension there - collection of related containers, ie. the entire microservice should be reproduceable. This means system needs to maintain all the linking and volume sharing of the components. > > It's easily runnable in Vagrant with use ofProject Atomic
> Developer Bundle. > > If you are interested in more info, I'dsuggest to read the readme
> in the repo, I hope it summarizes it clearly. > > It's a very minimal demo, but I think itsuggests the path, which
> could take us to the Unicorns land, quitewell:).
> > Let me know in case of any questions,suggestions or requests for
> guidance in case anybody decides to take thisfurther.
> > I would like to take this further, please letme know if my
> thought process is in the same line as yoursor any changes,
> suggestions. we need to work through whats needed to now integrate with the cccp-index content, and then map that back to deliverables. I had asked Zeeshan to look at registry side for delivery space, unsure how far he's gotten with that. I believe, I should look for integration with cccp-index content? Regards Bamacharan -- Bamacharan Kundu IRC Nick- bamachrn http://bamacharankundu.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-- Developer Experience Team Brno, Czech Republic Phone: +420 739 666 824 <tel:%2B420%20739%20666%20824> _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- Bamacharan Kundu IRC Nick- bamachrn http://bamacharankundu.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- Developer Experience Team Brno, Czech Republic Phone: +420 739 666 824 <tel:%2B420%20739%20666%20824> -- Developer Experience Team Brno, Czech Republic Phone: +420 739 666 824 _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel-- Bamacharan Kundu IRC Nick- bamachrn http://bamacharankundu.wordpress.com/
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel