On 06/03/2014 12:47 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 06/02/2014 05:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
- To remove ambiguity downstream as to where and what the code
represents. This includes replacing strings that brand a component to be a part of RHEL. eg: if something says 'the xxxx for Red Hat Enterprise Linux' we would replace that to say 'the xxxx for CentOS Linux'
Some notes to keep in mind while you go through stuff to check for branding issues : a) we are not trying to replace (c) Red Hat, or things where it says its Red Hat influenced, like the 'gcc -v' string
With these in mind, do we care about virt-manager, where it lists RHEL as a default install option? Should we amend that to be RHEL/CentOS, or leave it as-is?
If we can, we could/should add CentOS distros there - and set suiteable defaults to match. After all, the install route for CentOS Linux is quite different from RHEL ( even the ISO media! ).