14 Aug
2006
14 Aug
'06
2:40 p.m.
Greg Swallow - SkyNet wrote:
Lance Davis wrote:
The name appended is the upstream provider. Therefor it is not IBM's java and not BEA's java and certainly not CentOS's java. It is SUN's
java
:)
So yes, like Rex suggested, it should have appended 'sun' not 'centos'
Then maybe we need to call it -sun.centos or something
CentOS should probably name it what you'd guess RedHat would name it if they packaged it for RHEL4. I think "java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.06-1.centos" is the way to go. That's similar to the naming of the IBM java rpm's on the RHEL4 Extras CD.
agreed, much better.
-- Rex