On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:45:17PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Milan Keršláger wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:06:36PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Oh come on. Not that again. That has all been explained in *detail* in http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1402, where you couldn't explain either on where to obtain the gcc the kernel has been compiled with by the upstream vendor.
The SRC packages are available from Beta channel from RHN. There is a person from your team who exacly know the version. So grab the SRC package and rebuild.
Oh, you mean that beta channel where 3.4.6-3 was available, which wasn't the gcc version either upstream built their kernel rpm with (3.4.6-2)?
-3 has 4 bug more fixed. You never will have 3.4.6-2 even after release in U4. So where is the problem?
Do you want to build with compiler with 4 more bug fixed or with 5 or 6 more?
And now take that foot out of your mouth, it really makes you look funny.
And you too. Rules only for some people. Really funny.
I was asking to build non-crashing kernel only. Instead of fix I've got angry people trying to push me out. Really not funny end.