On 10/06/16 23:37, Jason Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 10/06/16 23:08, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 09/06/16 15:24, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
So, pick one. CentOS Virt SIG docker will have:
- Fedora rpm rebuilt
OR 2. RHEL rpms (docker + docker-latest) rebuilt (consider it a preview or something before official release) OR 3. Something else, maybe both Fedora and RHEL versions clearly separated by koji tags
What would the user experience look like here ?
as in, how do we tell the user that these options exist, what the story is, broadly, for each - and how they can consume them ?
For one thing, I'd want to include a newer docker in our devel/continuous release (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel) of centos atomic host, and it seems that having the coming-soon-to-extras docker would be a good fit for that image.
Beyond that, and other testing-type uses, I don't know that we'd necessarily want to advertise / promote these packages, but having them available would still be useful.
sounds good. I guess we start with keeping it to the builds we care about from the provider side, and then expand exposure ( blog posts, social media etc ) point people at these and ask for upstream projects adoption as we mature.
regards,