1 Dec
2010
1 Dec
'10
10:18 a.m.
Le 30/11/10 09:32, Manuel Wolfshant a écrit :
On 11/30/2010 12:48 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 29/11/10 21:08, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: ... My use of the quoted term "minimal" was perhaps misleading - I meant it to refer to the fact that Disk1 could be used as a stand alone disk and would not require the "optional" Disk2.
Argh.. Indeed, it was misleading. In this case I agree with you , having a fully contained first DVD ( even smaller than the maximum size allowed by the standard !) labeled and able to be used as "server DVD" would fit my needs.
+1
JML