On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 1:44 PM Neal Gompa ngompa13@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 7:23 AM Matthias Runge mrunge@matthias-runge.de wrote:
On 23/04/2020 19:12, lejeczek via CentOS-devel wrote:
Hi guys,
Here some bits being in collision:
virglrenderer.src 0.6.0-5.20180814git491d3b705.el8 advanced-virt virglrenderer.x86_64 0.6.0-5.20180814git491d3b705.el8 advanced-virt virglrenderer.x86_64 0.8.0-1.20191002git4ac3a04c.el8 epel
Please push as much as you can over to EPEL. It's way to often that
EPEL
gets unnecessary confronted by extras/third-parties repos while it should be taken advantage of.
I disagree here. If something is in centos repos (or RHEL for that matter), the package should not be in epel.
SIG repos do not qualify here. As SIG repos can do basically anything, including override CentOS base packages, it's not a mark to block inclusion in EPEL. They also don't necessarily map cleanly to RHEL content, either.
CloudSIG repos are not created nor tested to work with EPEL. Among other reasons CloudSIG support several stable releases which require different dependencies versions and EPEL is single rolling release.
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel