On 10/27/2014 02:23 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 24/10/14 16:07, Brian Stinson wrote:
What are some other examples of projects that would benefit from this workflow?
test suites for specific stuff ( eg. t_xen that checks if a new xen stack + kernel can still provision and run xen vm's ), documentation and code that maps to centos related efforts ( like centpkg and its dep chain ); these are all examples of the sort of projects I would expect to see using git.c.o as their upstream dev git's.
Also, SIG's have shown interest in moving some upstream content into git.centos.org - eg. the most recent conversations in the Atomic SIG about having some of their devel repos be moved into git.centos.org - and potentially doing some automated CI / testing around it as well.
Hi all - I don't really have input into the "how" of this, but I do have questions about the "when" - as in, do we have a target to coming to consensus, someone driving this, and ensuring it wraps up in a timely fashion.
(KB's comment is the last one I can find on the thread, and that was a week ago - so I'm concerned this has stalled without coming to resolution.)
Thanks,
jzb