On 11/18/2014 01:07 PM, Mike McLean wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@karan.org mailto:mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:
>> 5) vdsm-4.9-63.el6.src.rpm >> >> Centos has just one build of vdsm, which does not appear on ftp.rh.c. > > /var/ftp/pub/nfs/mirror/centos-second/vault/SRPMS/6.1/updates/SRPMS/vdsm-4.9-63.el6.src.rpm > > I see it as from the 6.1 era according to my 'additive' > mirroring ... additive in the sense that uniquely named files > are not deleted once seen, using a bit of basename() > post-processing yeah, i remember this one - it was mis-released upstream iirc, and then later moved aronud ( was it a rhev package ?? )
Yes, it appears to have been part of rhev-h.
So if it was an error, should we exclude it from the import?
I would say no if:
1. It is not maintained by CentOS
2. It was mistakenly released into the stream only once upstream, and then removed.
3. It was removed by CentOS.
Since all of those are true, I would say we do not need to import it.
It does not hurt anything to have it in git either, but I don't think it is required though.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes