On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 20:24 +0200, Julien Pivotto wrote:
On 12 May 11:04, BC wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuit s.eu> wrote:
Please remember that ze do not plan to expose that to users (e.g puppet will be installed in /usr, not in a SCL). However, those SCL will be used for dependencies and/or rebuilds of EPEL packages.
The big headline on softwarecollections.org is:
All versions of any software on your system. Together.
That is how I have always understood it. So how would installing to /usr fit the SCL paradigm? Or has the SCL paradigm changed?
We are not the SCL sig. We do not plan to let you install multiple versions of Puppet at the same time on your system.
Hi,
Why not have multiple versions of puppet, it seems like a good idea.
But even with just one I would also put everything in the software collection and just avoid the system, apart from anything else it will clash with the epel pkgs and what not.
Maybe a better way to rephrase it is:
which prefix will we use for our dependencies that are not packagable in the system?
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel