On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Brandon Davidson wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
and a couple more things jump out at me. By and large, I see NO dark art here, requiring that such a review and proposed fix cannot be done by anyone, diffing the present upstream original and the last shipped patches (once CentOS variant SRPMs are retrievable), and ...
Hey, just because I have time to track it down for a user on the forum and file a bug doesn't mean I have time to fix it ;) I agree, though, it doesn't look too difficult to correct the immediate issue. It looks like the original patch is from hughesjr; I'll keep an eye out for the 5.3 SRPMs and submit a patch if I have time.
frankly, who _cares_ to install packages which ** cannot ** work as upstream does not release the server side sources for the RHN, such that we cannot replicate it (it not being clear that we have a desire as a project to so proceed)
My point was that we are providing translations for packages that we don't ship, and contributing to the confusion of users that do install those packages on their own.
It's worth pointing out (again) that we are providing *erroneous* translations. The Red Hat Network *is* the Red Hat Network - there is no CentOS Network, etc.
--- Charlie