I have no idea why you are not seeing it, but it's been there for 2 and a half weeks on my installs::
$ rpm -qi firefox Name : firefox Version : 91.13.0 Release : 1.el9_0 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Wed 24 Aug 2022 06:19:44 PM EDT Group : Unspecified Size : 277674420 License : MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ Signature : RSA/SHA256, Mon 22 Aug 2022 03:47:12 AM EDT, Key ID 199e2f91fd431d51 Source RPM : firefox-91.13.0-1.el9_0.src.rpm Build Date : Thu 18 Aug 2022 03:25:16 AM EDT Build Host : x86-64-02.build.eng.rdu2.redhat.com Packager : Red Hat, Inc. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla Vendor : Red Hat, Inc. URL : https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/ Summary : Mozilla Firefox Web browser Description : Mozilla Firefox is an open-source web browser, designed for standards compliance, performance and portability.
On 11/09/2022 13:53, Branislav Náter wrote:
Phill, I don't see firefox-91.13.0-1.el9 in RHEL.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 1:56 PM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel <centos-devel@centos.org mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> wrote:
Am 11.09.22 um 09:41 schrieb Branislav Náter: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 8:46 PM Leon Fauster via CentOS-devel > <centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org>>> wrote: > > I wonder about the current firefox build 91.13.0-1.el9? Its not on the > mirrors (comp 20220829) nor in the last prod compose (20220909) / both > lists firefox-91.11.0-2.el9 ... Thanks. > > > For inclusion in the compose, it has to pass testing. Testing is still > in progress. > Hey, sure. It misses the c9s-candidate tag but to make my question more clearly: 91.11. is in the repos, 91.13. builded, but why is 91.12. still not verified and tagged with c9s-pending (as I understand the proccess)? Would the version in the "middle" be still blocked because of an embargo? Would the newer version not make such embargo immediately obsolete?I don't want to speak on behalf of the RHEL Firefox team, but I would guess that they are now focusing on releasing firefox-91.13.0-1.el9 for CentOS (thus skipping 91.12). Sorry to not provide more info.
https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=328 <https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=328> -- Thanks Leon _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel>Regards
Branislav Náter Principal Quality Engineer, Stacks QE IRC: bnater at #qa #urt #brno Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic redhat.com http://redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted http://redhat.com/trusted
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel