On 04/12/14 16:20, Brian Stinson wrote:
On Dec 01 09:52, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Brian Stinson bstinson@ksu.edu wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to start a discussion on where/how to ship the package building toolchain. Most of these tools shipped in EPEL, but deploying them to one of our repos would allow us to maintain our own patches if necessary and would eliminate any dependencies on 3rd party repositories for our core tools.
I'd much rather not do this for a couple reasons:
- CentOS Extras shouldn't overlap with EPEL.
- If there are reasons to customize/patch some of these things for the
CentOS infrastructure, perhaps they belong in a new/separate repo -- especially considering centos-extras is enabled by default.
Good points. Would a separate cbs-tools repo, with a cbs-tools-release package in CentOS-Extras be acceptable?
that might work, but why do we not want centos-extras to overlap EPEL ? Iirc, it already does this.
- KB