On 11/15/14, Alemesegd GIDEY alexyigidey.ag@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/6/14, centos-devel-request@centos.org centos-devel-request@centos.org wrote:
Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to centos-devel@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-devel-request@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at centos-devel-owner@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
- Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Sameer Kumar)
- Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Gururaj S Alagwadi)
- Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Elias Persson)
- Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Jeffrey Scheel)
- Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
- Re: Secondary archs and how we might build them (Karanbir Singh)
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:31:32 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org To: centos-devel@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build them Message-ID: 5459E064.8090608@karan.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 05/11/14 03:55, Sameer Kumar wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@karan.org mailto:mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:
On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > There has been reasonable levels of interest in the varioussecondary > arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just > too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
http://www.needtomeet.com/meeting?id=v8xfphi1E please go ahead andfill it out and lets make something happen next week.
?I am not sure why but I am not able to save my response. But Friday afternoon GMT works for me.
Any heads up on what architectures we are planning to discuss?
I am going to do the demo bits on i686, but the process is overall arch agnostic; the only special case is arm32 where the delivery path is largely via rootfs - but were a fair distance from that.
-- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 23:33:38 +0800 From: Sameer Kumar sameer.kumar@ashnik.com To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." centos-devel@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Secondary archs and how we might build them Message-ID: CADp-Sm6DFsgkAYokny1iykuizMik80sY4x+ySg7pKMReueYKtA@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On 5 Nov 2014 18:36, "Jeffrey Scheel" scheel@us.ibm.com wrote:
On 10/21/2014 06:06 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
There has been reasonable levels of interest in the various secondary arch's - i386 / powerpc / arm32 / arm64; but the Core SIG team is just too busy to actively participate and deliver on these.
Karanbir, I just requested attendance to the meeting. Please include me
and
the others on the needtomeet request. Thx, -Jeff
Jeffrey J. Scheel
Please include me in the invite for next call.
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel