On 16/06/14 20:36, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
As Karanbir announced it today, there will be "nightly builds" happening every day, starting from today (the first one being scheduled to start at 8PM UTC). The whole process will be automated and would also start to reflect those new trees. That means that the url to enter for new network install, and yum repositories will need to be using the 'latest' symlink when that one will appear. (Normally full URL would be http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest) As it will be the first time we'll test the end-to-end automation script, we have no real ETA, but we estimate the "time-to-process" between 3 and 4 hours (so content would be available on buildlogs.centos.org around 11 pm UTC, or slightly later)
We've also worked today on the Live Media iso images, so those ones will also be pushed on buildlogs.centos.org (later today, during the "nightly build" process) (see also https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-core!livemedia.git)
As a reminder :
- RPM packages are still unsigned
- yum config files are still missing (but you can point yum to the
mentioned repository)
- that tree is still "not production" ready and still needs to be
investigated (branding hunt, anyone ?)
- we count on you to provide feedback (positive or negative, but
feedback requested please)
- use #centos-devel (irc.freenode.net), @centos-devel list (here), but
also file bugs reports on our bugs tracking system (http://bugs.centos.org) and report those under the "CentOS-7" project
So , (ab)use the tree, break it, fix it (by filing bug reports - patches *welcome* :-) )
What is being "rebuilt" with these nightly rebuilds?
-Connie Sieh _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel Received: from lithium.arrfab.net (unknown [172.19.5.1]) by radium.arrfab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B9E39C646 for fabian.arrotin@arrfab.net; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:36:27 +0200 Received: from mail.centos.org (mail.centos.org [72.26.200.202]) by lithium.arrfab.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5GIaNpP017948 for fabian.arrotin@arrfab.net; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:36:24 +0200 Received: from mail.centos.org (voxeldev.centos.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67F5817EBA; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:36:23 +0000 Received: from ex-smtp.fnal.gov (mail04v-smtp02.fnal.gov [131.225.199.27]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1525467B1A for centos-devel@centos.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:36:21 +0000 Received: from dhcp-131-225-22-38.dhcp.fnal.gov (131.225.22.38) by ex-smtp.fnal.gov (131.225.199.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:36:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS 7 "nightly builds" and Live Media iso images From: =indows-1252?Q?Connie_Sieh?= csieh@fnal.gov To: =indows-1252?Q?The_CentOS_developers_mailing_list.? centos-devel@centos.org Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:36:19 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ndows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: 539F3687.2070903@arrfab.net References: 539F3687.2070903@arrfab.net X-Mailer: Zarafa 6.40.7-26119 Sender: =indows-1252?Q?csieh@fnal.gov?= centos-devel-bounces@centos.org Reply-To: =indows-1252?Q?The_CentOS_developers_mailing_list.? centos-devel@centos.org Precedence: list List-Id: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel.centos.org> List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel, mailto:centos-devel-request@centos.org?subject=subscribe List-Archive: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel List-Post: mailto:centos-devel@centos.org List-Help: mailto:centos-devel-request@centos.org?subject=lp List-Subscribe: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel, mailto:centos-devel-request@centos.org?subject=bscribe X-Spam-Status: No X-Beenthere: centos-devel@centos.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 X-Original-To: centos-devel@centos.org X-X-Sender: csieh@dhcp-131-225-22-38.dhcp.fnal.gov X-Arrfab-Bluewall-Mailscanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Arrfab-Bluewall-Mailscanner-Id: s5GIaNpP017948 X-Arrfab-Bluewall-Mailscanner: Found to be clean X-Arrfab-Bluewall-Mailscanner-From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org Message-Id: alpine.LRH.2.02.1406161334570.21751@dhcp-131-225-22-38.dhcp.fnal.gov
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
As Karanbir announced it today, there will be "nightly builds" happening every day, starting from today (the first one being scheduled to start at 8PM UTC). The whole process will be automated and would also start to reflect those new trees. That means that the url to enter for new network install, and yum repositories will need to be using the 'latest' symlink when that one will appear. (Normally full URL would be http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest) As it will be the first time we'll test the end-to-end automation script, we have no real ETA, but we estimate the "time-to-process" between 3 and 4 hours (so content would be available on buildlogs.centos.org around 11 pm UTC, or slightly later)
We've also worked today on the Live Media iso images, so those ones will also be pushed on buildlogs.centos.org (later today, during the "nightly build" process) (see also https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-core!livemedia.git)
As a reminder :
- RPM packages are still unsigned
- yum config files are still missing (but you can point yum to the
mentioned repository)
- that tree is still "not production" ready and still needs to be
investigated (branding hunt, anyone ?)
- we count on you to provide feedback (positive or negative, but
feedback requested please)
- use #centos-devel (irc.freenode.net), @centos-devel list (here), but
also file bugs reports on our bugs tracking system (http://bugs.centos.org) and report those under the "CentOS-7" project
So , (ab)use the tree, break it, fix it (by filing bug reports - patches *welcome* :-) )
What is being "rebuilt" with these nightly rebuilds?
-Connie Sieh
Packages reported by community (on bugs.centos.org) that need to be modified: * for CentOS/Branding issue or * for functional issue (for example, http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7172 -> anaconda modification, tagged as .centos and patched through git.centos.org)
Cheers,