Feels to me like even if the package has no changes it's 'different' than upstream and should have the label + appropriate coment somewhere in the README.
On 11/2/07, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1 against the 5.1 tree.
We thought about this at the time, however that would cause more confusion we felt. the '.centos' bit is added only when there is a change in the sources from upstream. I suppose we can revisit the policy should this kind of a thing become more common in the future.
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel