On 9/17/08, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote:
I have not really suggested to use this or that. I just wantet to make clear that we should keep the content in one single place for better maintainance.
I agree. And trac provides a very good mechanism for this. Given that its in use such widely, a lot of people are already familiar with the milestones / aims / features and the fact that you can url into the scm from the wiki makes in-revision tracking trivial. You can also assocated issues with milestones and releases and handle wiki content within the same context.
So it can be as easy as you want, but it can also easily do more complex things if you need it to.
There are some disadvantages in using trac which I have already lined out. One is the 'bad url' to access the trac pages. If artwork.centos.org (or something like that) would link to trac and the wiki just points there, all content could be kept in the trac wiki.
the URL issue does not look like anything major to me personally, also I dont see much of a differences in https://projects.centos.org/ and http://artwork.centos.org. Specially since the trac wiki is only 1 click away from the https://projects.centos.org link. The wiki.centos.org page at http://wiki.centos.org/Projects can have a few more comments about each project if so required.
Ok. I believe we should move the http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork content to https://projects.centos.org/trac/artwork/wiki ... if there is no one against that. So the Trac facilities on projects management could be used.
If that is ok ... some help would be nice :D
Cheers, al.